Each DNG file is around 30MB and it looks like the Aurora HDR saved files simply add all those source files together.
I'm pulling in between 3 and 7 DNG files to create the final HDR image. The HDR photos I've edited so far have all been using DNG files as the source files. The network performance may not be able to keep up in my case. The performance of my external hard drive over the WiFi network may be part of the problem. 4TB External Hard Drive via WiFi connectionĬlearly, it's not the latest and greatest hardware so your experience may vary if your computer has a bit more power than mine.I'm doing most of my editing on an older (mid-2011) 27" iMac with the following specs: The app seems to become a bit slow, especially when pulling in a large number of bracketed files. Aurora Performance Can Be Somewhat Sluggish Here are the biggest ones I've noticed so far. You have to balance ease of use with powerful features and that can be very difficult to do. Finding a good app to edit photos can be a real challenge.
Overall, Aurora HDR is a great image editing software. Here's the stuff we don't like about Aurora HDR: You can still import JPG files for editing in Aurora, but I strongly recommend you work your way to using RAW files instead. RAW files contain all the original information from an image and are much easier to manipulate. RAW camera file support - This feature may be considered a bit on the advanced side, but I like that Aurora supports native camera RAW files.So if you don't even want to bother with using Aurora separately from your existing workflow, you don't have to! Installing the plug-ins provides Aurora HDR editing functionality inside those applications.
#AURORA HDR PRO INSTALL#
#AURORA HDR PRO SOFTWARE#
Familiar Layout (as compared to Lightroom) - Part necessity and part tradition, photo editing software largely have the same features and functions so their arrangement of those features doesn't often deviate too dramatically.Considering how many options there are in photo editing, I really like the look and feel of Aurora HDR. This app looks like someone put some time and thought into the design of the application. Modern user interface (UI) - I know this may sound a bit silly, but as a software professional, I really appreciate a good looking, functional application.From my perspective, here are a list of the aspects the Aurora HDR software has going for it: I want to put together a simple list of easy to understand concepts for us HDR editing novices. Here's the stuff we really like about Aurora HDR: I set out to see just how good the Aurora HDR software was, from a beginner's perspective. To me, though, photography is definitely an art form, and HDR editing is one way to express your vision in a unique way. I've seen the amazing photos that it produces, and read some of the controversies surrounding the technique - namely the photos aren't "realistic". I know my way around my cameras and I can hold my own in Lightroom, but HDR is a pretty new concept to me. It should be known that I'm not an advanced HDR photo editing user at this point. Well, I'm glad that I didn't do that, because the product surprised me a bit. When I was asked to check out the Aurora HDR product (af), I almost dismissed it without even taking a look. However, I've yet to make the jump to the Adobe Cloud where HDR editing is supported.
I've really gotten used to the features and layout. My satisfaction with Adobe Lightroom remains high. Participating in the Samsung Imagelogger project introduced me to the Lightroom product. Was Aurora HDR yet another image editor trying to steal market share from the "big boys" like Adobe's Photoshop and Lightroom products? Admittedly, I was a bit skeptical when first approached by, the makers of the Aurora HDR photo editing software.
0 kommentar(er)
